• 2018山西力争农作物综合机械化率提高1.4个百分点以上 2018-03-26
  • 元旦去哪儿?南昌发布联手安义古村打造“古法新年” 2018-03-26
  • 世界杯倒计时100天 草皮待“唤醒”下月测试 2018-03-26
  • 搜索引擎蜘蛛抓取失败的原因有哪些? 2018-03-26
  • 海南:以“旅游+”展现原生态 民宿日趋火爆 2018-03-26
  • 重视研究陆军“走”的问题 2018-03-26
  • 济宁广电传媒集团揭牌成立 开启广电发展新篇章 2018-03-26
  • 国内成品油调价窗口今日开启 或创近半年最大降幅 2018-03-26
  • 60余万元假冒伪劣食品药品被集中销毁 2018-03-26
  • 美媒:受春节因素影响 中国2月制造业PMI季节性回落 2018-03-26
  • 《滚石》盛赞《黑豹》革新黑人文化! 查德维克博斯曼登杂志封面 瓦坎达陛下秀胸肌 – Mtime时光网 2018-03-26
  • 建始县:尖刀班进村既扶“口袋”又扶“脑袋” 2018-03-26
  • 我市召开民政系统党风廉政建设工作会 2018-03-26
  • 8家券商排队上市:长城证券预披露更新 经纪业务占比高 2018-03-26
  • 《红海行动》破23亿 黄景瑜讲述拍摄战地过程 2018-03-26
  •  

    英语短文

    健康短文 | 情商短文 | 生活短文 | 保健短文 | 家庭短文 | 健身短文 | 文化短文 | 市场营销 | 爱情短文 | 生活窍门

    图书营销 书评短文 文案策划 人文地理 语言能力 音乐资讯 谈判技巧 人生哲学 诗歌短文 公共关系 个人报告 演讲短文 宗教短文 写作能力 影视短文 名人明星 圣诞节

    Who owns the Copyright of a picture taken by a monkey?

    kira86 于2011-07-18发布 l 已有人浏览
    增大字体 减小字体
    By now you've probably heard of the "Cindy Sherman of the Monkey World," as we dubbed her recently.

    pk10高手论坛交流区 www.bdzq58.com 1.jpg

    By now you've probably heard of the "Cindy Sherman of the Monkey World," as we dubbed her recently. While working in an Indonesian national park, British nature photographer David Slater had his camera purloined by a clever macaque monkey who took several self-portraits, apparently fascinated by her own reflection in the lens. The exceptionally charming images that resulted caught the eye of Britain's Daily Mail and won the cheeky monkey fans around the world, as well as "calling into question notions of personae, monkeyhood, affect, and the history of photography itself," as we put it.

    We were being tongue-in-cheek, but as it turns out the images have indeed called the very nature of photography into question. The pics are now at the center of a lively debate about copyright, with implications not just for Slater but for the entire world of animal art (yes, there is a world of animal art).

    After hearing about the accidental monkey masterpieces, the Web site Techdirt posted a short essay musing on the fact that several of the images bore a credit line attributing them to the U.K.-based Caters News Agency, for which Slater works. Copyright is generally held by the person who takes the picture, and since the author was in this case the monkey -- Slater explicitly stated that he had no hand in creating the image -- Techdirt wondered by what basis Caters could have acquired the copyright.

    2.jpg
    The macaque monkey took the photos herself, without the assistance of human hand / Courtesy Caters

    Someone from the news agency promptly wrote to Techdirt to request that the images be removed from the site -- without, however, addressing the fact that the original post had specifically challenged Caters's legal right to own the monkey pics at all. "These images are being used without David's or our permission, therefore can I ask you remove these images from your site immediately," went the letter. Techdirt writer Michael Masnick replied in an email, asking what the legal rationale was for the request, and claiming "fair use" to boot.

    Caters News Agency fired back: "Michael, regardless of the issue of who does and doesn't own the copyright -- it is 100% clear that the copyright owner is not yourself. You have blatantly 'lifted' these photographs from somewhere -- I presume the Daily Mail online. On the presumption that you do not like to encourage copyright theft (regardless of who owns it) then please remove the photographs."

    Techdirt adduced the testimony of a number of legal experts to show that Caters's understanding of copyright here is shaky. More importantly, in a followup post, the Web site goes deeper into the intricacies of copyright law, concluding that it seems fairly clear on the fact that only humans get copyright, whether in Indonesia, the United Kingdom, or the United States. "In order to be entitled to copyright registration, a work must be the product of human authorship," says a quote by the U.S. Copyright Office. "Works produced by mechanical processes or random selection without any contribution by a human author are not registrable."

    All of this leads to big questions for the world of contemporary art, where works generated by "mechanical processes" and "random selection" are established parts of the vocabulary (see Cory Arcangel's current show at the Whitney) -- as are art projects that involve snapshots taken by a third party, for that matter (Nikki S. Lee). But never mind that, our question is: What does this mean for Cooper the Cat? The Seattle-based feline art phenomenon has built an empire -- or really, his owners have built an empire -- on his photographic snaps, made by a collar-mounted camera that automatically takes a picture every 10 minutes. Unframed photos by Cooper sell in $145 dollar range, and he even has a "Cat Cam" book of his work for sale. But now the very basis of his art practice may be called into question, all based on the actions of one goof of a monkey. Stay tuned.

     1 2 下一页

    相关英语学习内容Copyright

    本文评论
    您还能输入300

    更多>>保健短文最新更新

    更多>>Culture最新更新

    更多>>英语短文最新推荐

    英语短文阅读排行